Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Queens of Ra
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Rise of Giza PowerNudge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.49% — Rise of Giza PowerNudge is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
