Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Reel Gems
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 97.49%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS

Perfect Gems
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Reel Gems vs Perfect Gems
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 97.49% against 96.50% — Reel Gems is 0.99 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Reel Gems vs Supreme Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 97.49% against 96.39% — Reel Gems is 1.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




