Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Retro Reels
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
777 Surge™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Immortal Fruits
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,787×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Retro Reels vs 777 Surge™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.00%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Retro Reels does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Retro Reels vs Immortal Fruits
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.06%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Retro Reels does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
