Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Rugby Star Deluxe
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon, Sports
VS

Shaolin Soccer
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.93%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS

Space Coins
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Rugby Star Deluxe vs Shaolin Soccer
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.93% — Shaolin Soccer is 0.05 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Shaolin Soccer does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sports.
Rugby Star Deluxe vs Space Coins
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Space Coins does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Space Coins does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


