Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Suck
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wrath of Seth - Split
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 21,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Greek myth
VS
Mighty Mania
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Suck vs Wrath of Seth - Split
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- RTP cannot be compared: Suck does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Suck vs Mighty Mania
- Different format families: Suck is Cluster pays, Mighty Mania is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Suck does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mighty Mania does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
