Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Thunderstruck II
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Guardians of Ice & Fire
PG Soft
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Hooligan Hustle
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Thunderstruck II vs Guardians of Ice & Fire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.65% against 96.70%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Guardians of Ice & Fire does not publish a rating.
Thunderstruck II vs Hooligan Hustle
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.28% — Thunderstruck II is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
