Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Thunderstruck II

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.65%
Volatility
High
Win cap
Not published
Reels
5
Theme signals
Norse myth
Free demo available →
VS

Dwarf & Dragon

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.59%
Volatility
High
Win cap
14,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Dead Men Walking

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
25,313×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Horror
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Thunderstruck II vs Dwarf & Dragon

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.59% — Thunderstruck II is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Thunderstruck II vs Dead Men Walking

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.20% — Thunderstruck II is 0.45 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Dead Men Walking does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)