Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tiki Tiki Boom
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ancient Egypt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Frankenstein
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Tiki Tiki Boom vs Ancient Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.15% against 96.13%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Tiki Tiki Boom vs Frankenstein
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.15% against 96.19%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
