Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Unusual Suspects™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Low-medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS

Thor Hammer Time
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,328×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Asgardian Rising
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Unusual Suspects™ vs Thor Hammer Time
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.06% against 96.03%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Unusual Suspects™ vs Asgardian Rising
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Asgardian Rising does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Asgardian Rising does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



