Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Whale Rush

Microgaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.04%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

DJ Psycho

Nolimit City

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.05%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
25,420×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Reactoonz 100

Play’n GO

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
7
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Whale Rush vs DJ Psycho

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.05%.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 10,000× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: DJ Psycho does not publish a rating.

Whale Rush vs Reactoonz 100

  • Different format families: Whale Rush is Cluster pays, Reactoonz 100 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.20% — Reactoonz 100 is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)