Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Whale Rush

Microgaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.04%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Candy Jar Clusters

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.08%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sweets
Free demo available →
VS

Le Hooligan

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.34%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Whale Rush vs Candy Jar Clusters

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.08%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Whale Rush vs Le Hooligan

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)