Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Whale Rush
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Candy Jar Clusters
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Reactoonz 100
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Whale Rush vs Candy Jar Clusters
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.08%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Whale Rush vs Reactoonz 100
- Different format families: Whale Rush is Cluster pays, Reactoonz 100 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.20% — Reactoonz 100 is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
