Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Orient
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 97.49%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Shard
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Rise of Samurai
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Orient vs Dragon Shard
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 97.49% against 96.77% — Wild Orient is 0.72 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Wild Orient vs Rise of Samurai
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Rise of Samurai does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
