Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wrath of Seth - Split
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 21,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Greek myth
VS
Fortune of Olympus
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.55% — Fortune of Olympus is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 21,000× against 10,000×, with Wrath of Seth - Split higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fortune of Olympus returns more in theory over the long run, while Wrath of Seth - Split reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Greek myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
