Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
101 Candies
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,580×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Funk Master™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,300×
- Reels
- 8
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Genie's Magic Wishes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.12%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
101 Candies vs Funk Master™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.04%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,580× and 3,300×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 101 Candies does not publish a rating.
101 Candies vs Genie's Magic Wishes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.12%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 3,580× against 5,000×, with Genie's Magic Wishes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 101 Candies does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
