Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
101 Candies
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,580×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Funk Master™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,300×
- Reels
- 8
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
DJ Psycho
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,420×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
101 Candies vs Funk Master™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.04%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,580× and 3,300×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 101 Candies does not publish a rating.
101 Candies vs DJ Psycho
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.05%.
- Win caps differ by about 7.1×: 3,580× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 101 Candies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. 101 Candies returns more in theory over the long run, while DJ Psycho reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
