Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
101 Candies
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,580×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Funk Master™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,300×
- Reels
- 8
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Lordi Reel Monsters
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
101 Candies vs Funk Master™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.04%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,580× and 3,300×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 101 Candies does not publish a rating.
101 Candies vs Lordi Reel Monsters
- Different format families: 101 Candies is Cluster pays, Lordi Reel Monsters is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.20% — Lordi Reel Monsters is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 3,580× against 4,000×, with Lordi Reel Monsters higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 101 Candies does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
