Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Aloha! Christmas

NetEnt

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.00%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
1,800×
Reels
6
Theme signals
Not published
VS

Rise of Pyramids

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
95.97%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Egypt
Free demo available →
VS

Buster’s Bones

NetEnt

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.07%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
900×
Reels
6
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Aloha! Christmas vs Rise of Pyramids

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 95.97%.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.8×: 1,800× against 5,000×, with Rise of Pyramids higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Aloha! Christmas does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aloha! Christmas returns more in theory over the long run, while Rise of Pyramids reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Aloha! Christmas vs Buster’s Bones

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.07% — Buster’s Bones is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 1,800× against 900×, with Aloha! Christmas higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Aloha! Christmas does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Buster’s Bones returns more in theory over the long run, while Aloha! Christmas reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)