Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Aloha! Christmas
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rise of Pyramids
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 95.97%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Rotiki
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Aloha! Christmas vs Rise of Pyramids
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 95.97%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.8×: 1,800× against 5,000×, with Rise of Pyramids higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Aloha! Christmas does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aloha! Christmas returns more in theory over the long run, while Rise of Pyramids reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Aloha! Christmas vs Rotiki
- Different format families: Aloha! Christmas is Cluster pays, Rotiki is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.20% — Rotiki is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 1,800× against 1,000×, with Aloha! Christmas higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Aloha! Christmas does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rotiki returns more in theory over the long run, while Aloha! Christmas reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
