Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Aloha! Cluster Pays
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.42%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Le Football Fan
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.41%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Rotiki
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Aloha! Cluster Pays vs Le Football Fan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.42% against 96.41%.
- Win caps differ by about 3.6×: 700× against 2,500×, with Le Football Fan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Aloha! Cluster Pays does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aloha! Cluster Pays returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Football Fan reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Aloha! Cluster Pays vs Rotiki
- Different format families: Aloha! Cluster Pays is Cluster pays, Rotiki is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.42% against 96.20% — Aloha! Cluster Pays is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 700× against 1,000×, with Rotiki higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Aloha! Cluster Pays does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aloha! Cluster Pays returns more in theory over the long run, while Rotiki reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
