Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Arabian Nights
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.62%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,727×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Strolling Staxx: Cubic Fruits™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.98%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,400×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.62% against 95.98% — Strolling Staxx: Cubic Fruits™ is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,727× against 1,400×, with Arabian Nights higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Arabian Nights does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Strolling Staxx: Cubic Fruits™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Arabian Nights reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
