Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Arabian Nights
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.62%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,727×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rich Wilde and the Pearls of Vishnu
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.62% against 96.17% — Rich Wilde and the Pearls of Vishnu is 0.55 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,727× against 2,000×, with Rich Wilde and the Pearls of Vishnu higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Arabian Nights does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
