Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Arcane: Reel Chaos
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.81%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 774×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Rise of Merlin
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.81% against 96.58% — Arcane: Reel Chaos is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 6.5×: 774× against 5,000×, with Rise of Merlin higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Arcane: Reel Chaos does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Arcane: Reel Chaos returns more in theory over the long run, while Rise of Merlin reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
