Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Arcane: Reel Chaos
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.81%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 774×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Voodoo Magic
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.81% against 96.50% — Arcane: Reel Chaos is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 774× against 1,000×, with Voodoo Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Arcane: Reel Chaos does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Arcane: Reel Chaos returns more in theory over the long run, while Voodoo Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
