Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Asgardian Stones
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.31%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.31% against 96.08% — Asgardian Stones is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 1,000× against 1,300×, with Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Asgardian Stones does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Asgardian Stones returns more in theory over the long run, while Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
