Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Nolimit City

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.31% against 96.03% — Asgardian Stones is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 1,000× against 2,328×, with Thor Hammer Time higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Asgardian Stones does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Asgardian Stones returns more in theory over the long run, while Thor Hammer Time reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Norse myth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Asgardian Rising does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Asgardian Stones does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Norse myth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)