Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

NetEnt

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 95.56% against 96.23% — Berryburst MAX is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 1,300× against 3,000×, with Berryburst MAX higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Berryburst does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Different format families: Berryburst is Cluster pays, Leprechaun's Diamond Dig is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 95.56% against 96.20% — Leprechaun's Diamond Dig is 0.64 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 1,300× against 3,000×, with Leprechaun's Diamond Dig higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Berryburst does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Add to the comparison (up to four)