Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Berryburst MAX
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Candy Rush Wilds 2
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.23% against 96.21%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 3,000× against 5,000×, with Candy Rush Wilds 2 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Berryburst MAX does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Berryburst MAX returns more in theory over the long run, while Candy Rush Wilds 2 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
