Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Berryburst MAX
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Berryburst
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 95.56%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 95.56% — Berryburst MAX is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 3,000× against 1,300×, with Berryburst MAX higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Berryburst MAX does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
