Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Berryburst MAX
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Sugar Supreme Powernudge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
DJ Psycho
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,420×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Berryburst MAX vs Sugar Supreme Powernudge
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.09% — Berryburst MAX is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 3,000× against 5,000×, with Sugar Supreme Powernudge higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Berryburst MAX does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Berryburst MAX returns more in theory over the long run, while Sugar Supreme Powernudge reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Berryburst MAX vs DJ Psycho
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.05% — Berryburst MAX is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 8.5×: 3,000× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Berryburst MAX does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Berryburst MAX returns more in theory over the long run, while DJ Psycho reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
