Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Blood Suckers
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 98.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 900×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Truth
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Devil's 13
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Blood Suckers vs Truth
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Blood Suckers does not publish a rating.
Blood Suckers vs Devil's 13
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Devil's 13 does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 900× against 1,300×, with Devil's 13 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Blood Suckers does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
