Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.12% — Genie's Magic Wishes is 0.05 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 5.6×: 900× against 5,000×, with Genie's Magic Wishes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Buster’s Bones is Cluster pays, Rotiki is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.20% — Rotiki is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 900× against 1,000×, with Rotiki higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)