Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

NetEnt

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.00% — Buster’s Bones is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 900× against 1,800×, with Aloha! Christmas higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Buster’s Bones returns more in theory over the long run, while Aloha! Christmas reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.41% — Le Football Fan is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.8×: 900× against 2,500×, with Le Football Fan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)