Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Buster’s Bones
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 900×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Red Hot Luck
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Buster’s Bones vs Red Hot Luck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.07% against 96.08%.
- Win caps differ by about 5.6×: 900× against 5,000×, with Red Hot Luck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.
Buster’s Bones vs Aloha! Christmas
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.00% — Buster’s Bones is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 900× against 1,800×, with Aloha! Christmas higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Buster’s Bones returns more in theory over the long run, while Aloha! Christmas reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




