Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Buster’s Bones
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 900×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Red Hot Luck
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rotiki
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Buster’s Bones vs Red Hot Luck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.07% against 96.08%.
- Win caps differ by about 5.6×: 900× against 5,000×, with Red Hot Luck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.
Buster’s Bones vs Rotiki
- Different format families: Buster’s Bones is Cluster pays, Rotiki is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.20% — Rotiki is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 900× against 1,000×, with Rotiki higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buster’s Bones does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
