Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Codex of Fortune
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 98.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Fortune Rangers™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.90%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Codex of Fortune vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Codex of Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Codex of Fortune vs Fortune Rangers™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 98.00% against 96.90% — Codex of Fortune is 1.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Codex of Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
