Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Conan
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mega Fortune™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.60%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Galaxy Babies
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,575×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Conan vs Mega Fortune™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.60% — Conan is 0.05 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,800× and 1,700×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Conan does not publish a rating.
Conan vs Galaxy Babies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Galaxy Babies does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 1,800× against 1,575×, with Conan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Conan does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
