Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cornelius
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
7 Sins
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.30%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,580×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cash Noire
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cornelius vs 7 Sins
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.30% — 7 Sins is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 1,000× against 1,580×, with 7 Sins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cornelius does not publish a rating.
Cornelius vs Cash Noire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.06%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cornelius does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
