Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cupcakes
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,700×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
VS
Sugar Teddy x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Grace of Ebisu
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cupcakes vs Sugar Teddy x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cupcakes does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Cupcakes vs Grace of Ebisu
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Grace of Ebisu does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.9×: 2,700× against 5,000×, with Grace of Ebisu higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cupcakes does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
