Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cursed Treasure
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Gonzo's Quest
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.97%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Bonny’s Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cursed Treasure vs Gonzo's Quest
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.09% against 95.97% — Cursed Treasure is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 5,000× against 2,200×, with Cursed Treasure higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cursed Treasure does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Cursed Treasure vs Bonny’s Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.09% against 96.09%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cursed Treasure does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
