Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Play’n GO

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.09% against 96.26% — Octopus Treasure is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Cursed Treasure does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.09% against 92.00% — Cursed Treasure is 4.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 5,000× against 12,556×, with Pirate's Plunder higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Cursed Treasure does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Cursed Treasure returns more in theory over the long run, while Pirate's Plunder reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Add to the comparison (up to four)