Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cursed Treasure
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Octopus Treasure
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.26%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cursed Treasure vs Octopus Treasure
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.09% against 96.26% — Octopus Treasure is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cursed Treasure does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Cursed Treasure vs Great Game Rockies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.09% against 96.33% — Great Game Rockies is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cursed Treasure does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
