Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 66,666×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Halloween Jack™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.28% — Halloween Jack™ is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 9.4×: 66,666× against 7,100×, with Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Halloween Jack™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
