Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 66,666×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Scales of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.21% — Scales of Dead is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.3×: 66,666× against 20,000×, with Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Scales of Dead returns more in theory over the long run, while Dead or Alive™ 3: Wanted reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
