Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Microgaming

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Divine Fortune does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.59% against 92.00% — Divine Fortune is 4.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Divine Fortune does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Divine Fortune returns more in theory over the long run, while Shaolin Fortunes 100 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)