Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Don’t Eat the Candy
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,110×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
King of Sweets
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.13% against 96.20% — King of Sweets is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 3,110× against 5,000×, with King of Sweets higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Don’t Eat the Candy does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
