Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Elements: The Awakening
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Splash of Riches
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Starburst™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Elements: The Awakening vs Splash of Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.02%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Elements: The Awakening does not publish a rating.
Elements: The Awakening vs Starburst™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.02% against 96.08% — Starburst™ is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 800× and 800×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Elements: The Awakening does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
