Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Excalibur
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

The Grape Escape
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,324×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Excalibur vs The Grape Escape
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.08% against 95.00% — Excalibur is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 1,800× against 1,324×, with Excalibur higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Excalibur does not publish a rating.
Excalibur vs Arabian Nights
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.08% against 95.62% — Arabian Nights is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,800× and 1,727×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Excalibur does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Arabian Nights returns more in theory over the long run, while Excalibur reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




