Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fairytale Legends: Red Riding Hood™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.33%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Arcane Elements
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 608×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.33% against 86.00% — Fairytale Legends: Red Riding Hood™ is 10.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 800× against 608×, with Fairytale Legends: Red Riding Hood™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fairytale Legends: Red Riding Hood™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
