Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Finn and the Dragon Tales
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,800×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS
Lucky Clucks™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.19% — Lucky Clucks™ is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Finn and the Dragon Tales does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
